for Paula

Paula:

I remember an article that you wrote in the previous issue , -as I understood – I thin it was about two actions that happen in the same time but one depends on the other at some point but not vis versa!
Well , I think that this time you are trying to do the opposite, when you have action A overlapping the happening of action B. in the example of the farting dog it actually stops the importance of the funeral! and exclude the poetic importance of its nature! Our MR. Farting dog if you allow me to use your example is only important because it happens on the time of the funeral or a religious ceremony! So looking back at your previous article Action A here depends on Action B! I can imagine the priest shock being interrupted by the sound of the fart as a notion of un-respect! Well that makes me think what if a regular person farts! Will he still be shocked or mad! If you want objects to object! I think we have to investigate in the POWERING presence of the objected hence the interrupter!